Trust in Transition

Written on

Aug 5, 2024

I. Introduction

Trust has been the benchmark of successful business transactions throughout history. In ancient times, civilizations relied on the barter system, where trust in people and their products was paramount. As trade networks grew, the introduction of currency systems further emphasized the need for trust, reinforced through measures like verbal assurances and royal seals (Smithin 2000). Businesses flourished across the world as the currency system made the possibility of transactions broader and more sophisticated. Furthermore, despite the remarkable evolution in business efficiency, trust remains crucial. According to a report by PwC (2022), trust is fundamental to business success, influencing consumer behaviour, corporate reputation, and long-term growth. From the ancient barter systems to modern-day global corporations, one constant has defined successful business transactions: trust. Right from deal negotiation in a bustling medieval marketplace, where a merchant's word and reputation were all that guaranteed the quality of their product to today's digital age, where corporations invest millions in cultivating consumer trust through sophisticated branding and transparency initiatives (Deloitte 2020).

The above arguments highlight that while the means have evolved, the essence remains the same – trust is the currency that greases the wheels of commerce. The PwC report "Trust: The Overlooked Sustainable Advantage" (2022) explores trust building and sustainability and underscores this truth, highlighting trust as a fundamental driver of consumer behaviour, corporate reputation, and long-term growth in an increasingly complex global market. As businesses navigate this landscape, a critical question emerges: How do trust-building strategies differ between local enterprises and multinational corporations?

II. The Evolution of Trust in Business

The evolution of trust in business is a testament to its enduring significance. In ancient barter systems, trust was the foundation of every transaction. People relied on personal relationships and reputation, knowing that dishonesty could devastate their standing in the community. As trade expanded, the introduction of currency revolutionized the way transactions were conducted.

Currency systems brought a new dimension to trust, as people had to believe in the value and authenticity of the money they used. This period saw the implementation of various trust-building measures, such as stamped coins and governmental seals, to ensure the credibility of the currency. Despite these advancements, the core principle of trust remained unchanged. In modern business, trust is still paramount. Rachel Botsman notes that trust has become the currency of the digital age, essential for fostering collaboration and innovation. Furthermore, according to Botsman, "Money is the currency of transactions. Trust is the currency of interactions." The statement holds for the entire spectrum of businesses at all scales, including small local businesses as well as large multinational conglomerates.

However, one needs to note that even though money enables successful transactions and trust ensures successful interactions between all stakeholders within a business, the advent of technology has added another layer of efficiency to the scalability of businesses. On one hand, this has been a propellant for multinational corporations, but on the other hand, it seemed to have limited the possibility of exponential growth and scalability of local businesses. For instance, we can take the example of hiring: despite new and faster methods of technology-enabled hiring through software that conducts background checks, most local businesses still bank upon the traditional methods of hiring, which are related to personal and family connections. This is one of the many examples that stop age-old established businesses from scaling because their narrative of trust has remained unchanged despite the change in times.

Nevertheless, there certainly have also been outliers to these norms where family-held small and local enterprises have scaled their brand presence across countries. The goal of this article is to explore the many faces of scalability of trust in local versus multinational corporations by drawing comparisons as well as exploring some key challenges on both ends with the help of insights, thoughts, and case studies to understand what makes trust scalable versus what restrains the same.

III. Recruitment: Personal Connections vs. Technological Verification

In the ever-evolving landscape of business, the art of recruitment stands as a pivotal battleground where the stark contrast between local enterprises and multinational giants is visible. While the former clings to the time-honoured traditions of personal connections and word-of-mouth recommendations, the latter embraces the cutting edge of technology, leveraging data-driven processes and digital screening tools.

A. Traditional Local Business Recruitment Methods

For generations, local businesses have relied on the unshakable foundation of personal and family connections to build their workforce. One of the key reasons for preference for this method in hiring is that it takes care of background checks and creates a sense of safety and familiarity for local business owners. Now that our world has become far more globalised than before yet, a study by the National Federation of Independent Business revealed that a staggering 52% of small businesses consider referrals from current employees as their most effective recruiting tool (NFIB, 2018).

B. Multinational Corporation Recruitment Practices

In stark contrast, multinational corporations have embraced the digital age, employing technology-driven background checks and standardized hiring processes. A survey by CareerBuilder found that 70% of employers now utilize social media to screen candidates during the hiring process (CareerBuilder, 2018). Background checks have become a ubiquitous practice, with 96% of employers conducting at least one type of screening, as reported by HR.com and the National Association of Professional Background Screeners (HR.com & NAPBS, 2019). Furthermore, 93% of Fortune 500 companies have integrated applicant tracking systems into their recruitment strategies, reflecting a commitment to streamlined and data-driven hiring processes (Jobscan, 2020).

C. Implications for scaling local businesses

This technological divide has far-reaching implications for local businesses seeking to scale their operations. A report by the World Bank suggests that small and medium enterprises (SMEs) often struggle to compete for top talent due to their limited resources and less structured hiring processes (World Bank, 2019). The LinkedIn Global Recruiting Trends report further highlights this disparity, with 67% of hiring managers believing that technology has made recruiting more strategic, potentially putting traditional methods at a disadvantage (LinkedIn, 2018).

However, amidst this data-driven landscape, the narrative of trust remains a compelling counterpoint. For centuries, local businesses have thrived on the bedrock of personal connections and community reputation, forging a bond of trust that transcends the cold calculations of algorithms. As we delve deeper into this exploration, we must grapple with the question: In an age where technology reigns, can the time-honoured tradition of trust-based hiring still propel local businesses to new heights, or will they be forced to adapt to the digital currents sweeping the corporate world? Let’s delve into some case studies to further explore the answer to this question.

D. Case Studies:

The case of Wegmen Food Markets and Local Business Reliance on Personal Connections:
In the realm of local enterprises, the bond of trust forged through personal connections remains a cornerstone of recruitment. Wegmans Food Markets, a family-owned supermarket chain, exemplifies this tradition. With a long-standing history of promoting from within and relying on employee referrals, Wegmans filled an impressive 40% of their open positions through this trusted network in 2019 (Wegmans, 2020 Corporate Responsibility Report). This reliance on the strong ties of community and familiarity has been a cornerstone of their success.

The case of Zingerman’s Deli Word-of-Mouth Recommendations in Small Businesses:
The power of word-of-mouth recommendations is a potent force in the world of small businesses. Zingerman's Deli in Ann Arbor, Michigan, stands as a testament to this truth. This local institution built its workforce largely through the whispers of community connections and the echoes of its unique culture and local reputation, making it a sought-after employer (Inc. Magazine, "How I Did It: Ari Weinzweig, Zingerman's", 2010). In this realm, trusted voices carry weight far beyond the reach of any algorithm.

Unilever and Technology-Driven Background Checks in Multinational Corporations:
On the other side of the spectrum, multinational corporations have embraced the power of technology to streamline and optimize their recruitment processes. Unilever, a global consumer goods giant, implemented AI-powered video interviewing and game-based assessments for graduate recruitment. This bold move not only reduced hiring time by a staggering 75% but also increased diversity in their candidate pool (Unilever, "Future of HR", 2018), underscoring the transformative potential of technological innovation in the realm of talent acquisition.

Standardized Hiring Processes in Large Corporations:
The implementation of rigorous and standardized hiring processes has become a hallmark of large corporations as they scale their operations. Google's well-documented approach, which includes multiple interviews and a hiring committee review, has been crucial in maintaining its exacting standards as it grew from a fledgling startup to a global tech titan ("Work Rules!" by Laszlo Bock, former SVP of People Operations at Google, 2015). This unwavering commitment to process and consistency has been a cornerstone of their success.

In contrast to the above, Implications for Scaling Local Businesses:
As local businesses set their sights on scaling their operations, the need to adapt their hiring practices becomes increasingly apparent. Warby Parker, the disruptive eyewear company, serves as a compelling case study in this transition. Starting with a small team hired through personal networks, they quickly realized the necessity of implementing more structured processes and leveraging technology as they grew from a startup to a company with over 1,400 employees (Harvard Business School Case Study, "Warby Parker: Vision of a 'Good' Fashion Brand", 2015). This strategic shift in their recruitment approach was a crucial catalyst for their meteoric growth.

SMEs Struggling to Compete for Talent:
Despite the allure of personal connections and community trust, local businesses and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) often find themselves at a disadvantage when competing for top talent. A study of UK SMEs by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) revealed a sobering reality: 43% of SMEs struggle to recruit due to competition from larger firms with more resources and established hiring processes (CIPD, "Resourcing and Talent Planning Survey", 2017). This disparity highlights the challenges faced by smaller entities in an increasingly competitive talent landscape.

Technology Making Recruiting More Strategic:
As technology continues to reshape the recruitment landscape, its impact extends beyond mere efficiency gains. Companies like L'Oréal have embraced this digital transformation, implementing an AI-powered chatbot named Mya for initial candidate screening. This innovation has allowed their recruiters to focus on more strategic aspects of hiring, improving efficiency and candidate experience (L'Oréal, "Digital HR: The New Standard", 2019). In this ever-evolving ecosystem, the strategic integration of technology has become a key differentiator for those seeking to gain a competitive edge in the war for talent.

IV. Lending and Investment: Relationship-Based vs. Data-Driven

A. Traditional lending practices in local businesses

The following describes the lending practices of local businesses which are broadly divided into two categories:

  1. Personal knowledge and connections:
    Local businesses have long relied on personal relationships for lending. For instance, Handmade in America, a nonprofit supporting craft entrepreneurs in North Carolina, found that 60% of artisans secured loans through personal connections with local bankers (Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, 2015). This relationship-based lending is particularly prevalent in rural areas. A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City revealed that rural small businesses were 5% more likely to receive loans from local community banks compared to their urban counterparts, largely due to personal relationships (Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 2017).

  2. Community-based reputation:
    Community reputation plays a crucial role in local lending. The case of Southern Bancorp, a community development bank in Arkansas, illustrates this. They consider factors like an applicant's standing in the community when making lending decisions, which has helped them maintain a loan loss rate below the industry average while serving underbanked communities (Stanford Social Innovation Review, "Banking on the Poor", 2019).

B. Modern lending methods in large corporations

The following describes the lending practices of large corporations which are broadly divided into two categories:

  1. Data-based lending decisions
    In contrast, large corporations increasingly rely on data-driven lending. JPMorgan Chase, for example, developed a machine learning program called COiN (Contract Intelligence) that reviews commercial loan agreements. This system accomplishes in seconds what previously took 360,000 hours of legal work annually (Harvard Business Review, "How AI Is Changing Work", 2019).

  2. Credit scoring and risk assessment algorithms
    The use of algorithms for credit decisions is now widespread. Kabbage, an online lending platform acquired by American Express, uses AI to analyze real-time business data from various sources, allowing them to make lending decisions in minutes. This approach has enabled them to provide over $16 billion in funding to small businesses (Kabbage, 2021 Annual Report).

C. Impact on access to capital for local businesses

The shift towards data-driven lending poses challenges for local businesses accustomed to relationship-based practices. A Federal Reserve survey found that small businesses seeking less than $100,000 in funding were approved only 45% of the time at large banks, compared to 76% at small banks (Federal Reserve Small Business Credit Survey, 2021). This disparity is partly due to the inability of traditional businesses to provide the extensive digital footprint required by algorithmic lending models.

However, some fintech companies are bridging this gap. Square Capital, for instance, has provided over $9 billion in loans to small businesses by analyzing transaction data from their point-of-sale systems. This approach allows them to lend to businesses that might not qualify under traditional banking criteria (Square, Q4 2021 Shareholder Letter).

The case of OnDeck, another online lender, further illustrates the scalability of data-driven lending. By 2020, they had provided over $13 billion in loans to small businesses across the US, Canada, and Australia, using a proprietary credit scoring model that analyzes thousands of data points (OnDeck, 2020 Annual Report).

These examples underscore the difficulty of scaling businesses using traditional, local methods of ensuring professional trust and credibility. While relationship-based lending continues to play a role, particularly in smaller communities, the ability to make rapid, data-driven decisions is becoming crucial for lenders to operate at scale. Local businesses that can't adapt to these new paradigms may find themselves at a disadvantage when seeking capital for growth. The challenge moving forward will be to find ways to incorporate the benefits of personal relationships and community knowledge into scalable, technology-driven lending models.

V. Credit Lines: Personal Knowledge vs. Systematic Processes

Credit lines stand as an example of how technology has been an enabler to building and scaling trust. In the following sections, we discuss the key differences between personal knowledge-based versus systemic processes in leading.

A. Traditional Wholesaler Credit Practices

For generations of local businesses local businesses have depended upon personal relationships and trust-based credit arrangements and for the traditional wholesalers, this age-old practice has worked well while enabling flexible and informal credit terms that foster a sense of community and mutual understanding. This method of lending continues to have some hold despite newer options made available by technology for instance a study by the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) found that over 60% of small businesses relied on personal relationships and trust when granting credit to their customers (NFIB, "Small Business Credit Study," 2019).

B. Corporate Credit Management Systems

In stark contrast, multinational corporations are governed by the precision of automated systems and standardized credit policies. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems and dedicated credit management software have become the norm, replacing the human touch with algorithms and data-driven decision-making. The good this about this method of lending is that it encourages standardised practices in lending while making it accessible to everyone, unlike the traditional wholesaler credit practices which also have a reputation for unfair practices. A report by Gartner revealed that 75% of large enterprises have implemented ERP systems, enabling real-time credit monitoring and automated credit limit management (Gartner, "ERP Market Share Analysis," 2020). Furthermore, a survey by the Credit Research Foundation (CRF) found that 88% of Fortune 500 companies have formalized credit policies in place, ensuring consistency and mitigating risk across their global operations (CRF, "Credit Policy Benchmarking Study," 2018). These figures point towards the rising popularity of a more convenient method of lending.

C. Challenges for Local Businesses in Adapting to Formalized Credit Systems

As technological advancement continues to reshape the business landscape, local enterprises find themselves at a crossroads, grappling with the challenge of adapting to these formalized credit systems while preserving the personal connections that have long been their lifeblood. A study by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) highlighted the struggles faced by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in navigating the complexities of formal credit systems, citing a lack of resources and expertise as significant barriers to growth (IFC, "Closing the Credit Gap for Formal and Informal Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises," 2017).

However, amidst these challenges, a glimmer of hope emerges. Local businesses that embrace the power of technology while retaining the essence of their personal touch might be able to bridge the gap between tradition and modernity. By integrating user-friendly credit management solutions and leveraging data with ease, these enterprises can streamline their credit processes while preserving the human connections that have been the cornerstone of their success while also advocating fairer practices.

VI. Brand Perception: Exclusivity vs. Accessibility

The perception of a brand stands is an interesting example which highlights the contrast in philosophies that govern local enterprises and multinational corporations.

A. Traditional Local Brand Perceptions

For generations, the hallmark of local businesses has been an exclusive clientele which is often bound by personal relationships and legacy. This approach has been particularly prevalent in industries where craftsmanship and heritage hold sway, such as the world of fine jewellery, handmade furniture, fine tapestry etc.

We can further understand this by the example of a local jeweller, whose reputation has been forged over decades of meticulous attention to detail and unwavering commitment to their craft. For such a jeweller their clientele is often a set of families who have been their customers for a few generations or those that have a certain social standing. The doors of these businesses are often than not, close to the common man. Traditional businesses depend on the allure of exclusivity and the promise of a personalized experience for their customers.

B. Modern Corporate Brand Strategies

In contrast to the exclusive nature of traditional businesses, the corporate world has embraced a philosophy of accessibility, casting a wide net that seeks to engage and captivate diverse audiences across the globe. Large corporations take the help of behavioral economic tools, widespread customer surveys and multimedia advertisements even for those items that are often associated with luxury. For instance, Tanishq, a prominent Indian jewellery brand has become synonymous with transparency and customer-centric experiences while offering services and products to a widespread demography including those from modest family backgrounds.

Through a deliberate shift towards an open and inclusive brand identity, Tanishq and other similar brands like Reliance Jewels have been able to disrupt the market by breaking away from the norm of exclusivity and subscribing to that accessibility along with a relentless commitment to transparency and a deep understanding of its customers' evolving needs. Their "My Tanishq" campaign, which celebrated the diverse stories and relationships that adorn their jewellery, struck a chord with audiences across India, fostering a sense of connection and resonance (Tanishq, "My Tanishq Campaign," 2018). A study by the Harvard Business Review found that brands that successfully blended tradition and innovation outperformed their peers, with customers perceiving them as more authentic and trustworthy (HBR, "The Authenticity Paradox," 2019). Furthermore, research by Bain & Company revealed that companies that effectively balanced exclusivity and accessibility in their brand strategies achieved higher customer loyalty and advocacy rates (Bain & Company, "Luxury Goods Worldwide Market Study," 2021).

Conclusion

The evolution of trust in business, from ancient barter systems to modern digital transactions, underscores its enduring importance in commerce. As we've explored various aspects of business operations—recruitment, lending, credit lines, and brand perception—it's clear that both local enterprises and multinational corporations grapple with the challenge of building and scaling trust, albeit through different approaches.

Local businesses have long relied on personal connections, community reputation, and relationship-based practices to establish trust. This approach has served them well in many aspects, from hiring through personal referrals to securing loans based on community standing. The case of Wegmans Food Markets, filling 40% of their positions through employee referrals, exemplifies the strength of this traditional model.

Conversely, multinational corporations have embraced technology-driven processes to scale trust across global operations. From AI-powered recruitment at Unilever to automated credit management systems used by Fortune 500 companies, these organizations leverage data and standardized processes to build trust at scale. And these organisations have an edge over traditional businesses especially when it comes to speed and extent of scalability.

However, the landscape is not black and white. The success of companies like Square Capital and OnDeck in providing loans to small businesses through data-driven models suggests that technology can bridge the gap between personal relationships and scalable trust. Similarly, brands like Tanishq have shown that it's possible to blend tradition with innovation, and accessibility with exclusivity, to build trust across diverse customer segments.

As we look to the future, several questions emerge:

1. Can local businesses adopt technological solutions without losing the personal touch that has been their competitive advantage?

2. How can multinational corporations incorporate elements of personal relationships and community knowledge into their standardized processes?

3. What role will emerging technologies like blockchain play in building and scaling trust in business transactions?

4. How will changing consumer expectations around privacy and data usage impact trust-building strategies for both local and global businesses?

5. Can a hybrid model emerge that combines the best of both worlds—the personal touch of local businesses with the scalability of multinational corporations?

The answers to these questions will likely shape the future of trust in business. As the World Economic Forum's report on "The Future of Trust" (2021) suggests, trust will remain a critical factor in business success, but the means of building and maintaining it will continue to evolve.

For local businesses, the challenge lies in adapting to technological advancements without losing their essence. The success stories of companies like Warby Parker, which transitioned from a startup relying on personal networks to a corporation with structured hiring processes, offer a roadmap for such evolution. For multinational corporations, the task is to infuse their standardized processes with elements of personal connection and community engagement. Google's hiring process, which combines rigorous standardization with a focus on cultural fit, provides an example of this balance. More and more companies have started adapting to these norms in recent times with initiatives such as employer branding to customised onboarding kits to add a personal touch to business relationships.

Ultimately, the future of trust in business may lie in a convergence of these approaches. As the lines between local and global continue to blur in our interconnected world, businesses of all sizes will need to find ways to leverage technology while maintaining the human connections that underpin trust.

The journey ahead is complex and fraught with challenges, but also ripe with opportunities. As businesses navigate this landscape, their success will hinge on their ability to adapt, innovate, and most importantly, to understand and respond to the evolving nature of trust in the digital age.

In conclusion, while the methods of building and scaling trust may change, its fundamental importance in business remains constant. The businesses that will thrive in the future will be those that can effectively blend the personal with the technological, the local with the global, to create robust, scalable, and trustworthy brands.

References:

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. (2015). Handmade in America: Supporting Craft Entrepreneurs.

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. (2017). Relationship-Based Lending in Rural Small Businesses.

  • Harvard Business Review. (2019). How AI Is Changing Work.

  • Kabbage. (2021). Annual Report.

  • Federal Reserve Small Business Credit Survey. (2021).

  • Square. (Q4 2021). Shareholder Letter.

  • OnDeck. (2020). Annual Report.

  • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). (2019). Small Business Credit Study.

  • Gartner. (2020). ERP Market Share Analysis.

  • Credit Research Foundation (CRF). (2018). Credit Policy Benchmarking Study.

  • International Finance Corporation (IFC). (2017). Closing the Credit Gap for Formal and Informal Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises.

  • Tanishq. (2018). My Tanishq Campaign.

  • Harvard Business Review. (2019). The Authenticity Paradox.

  • Bain & Company. (2021). Luxury Goods Worldwide Market Study.

  • Smithin, J. (2000). "What is Money?" Routledge.

  • PwC. (2022). "Trust: The Overlooked Sustainable Advantage."

  • Deloitte. (2020). "Global Marketing Trends."

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. (2015). Handmade in America: Supporting Craft Entrepreneurs.

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. (2017). Relationship-Based Lending in Rural Small Businesses.

  • PwC. (2022). "Trust: The Overlooked Sustainable Advantage."

  • Botsman, R. (2017). "Who Can You Trust?" Penguin Books.

  • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). (2018). "Small Business Credit Study."

  • CareerBuilder. (2018). "Social Media Screening Survey."

  • HR.com & National Association of Professional Background Screeners (NAPBS). (2019). "Background Screening Trends."

  • Jobscan. (2020). "Fortune 500 Companies and Applicant Tracking Systems."

  • World Bank. (2019). "SMEs and Access to Finance."

  • LinkedIn. (2018). "Global Recruiting Trends."

  • Wegmans. (2020). "Corporate Responsibility Report."

  • Inc. Magazine. (2010). "How I Did It: Ari Weinzweig, Zingerman's."

  • Unilever. (2018). "Future of HR."

  • Bock, L. (2015). "Work Rules!" Hachette Book Group.

  • Harvard Business School Case Study. (2015). "Warby Parker: Vision of a 'Good' Fashion Brand."

  • Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD). (2017). "Resourcing and Talent Planning Survey."

  • L'Oréal. (2019). "Digital HR: The New Standard."

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. (2015). Handmade in America: Supporting Craft Entrepreneurs.

  • Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. (2017). Relationship-Based Lending in Rural Small Businesses.

  • Stanford Social Innovation Review. (2019). "Banking on the Poor."

  • Harvard Business Review. (2019). "How AI Is Changing Work."

  • Kabbage. (2021). Annual Report.

  • Federal Reserve Small Business Credit Survey. (2021).

  • Square. (Q4 2021). Shareholder Letter.

  • OnDeck. (2020). Annual Report.

  • National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). (2019). "Small Business Credit Study."

  • Gartner. (2020). "ERP Market Share Analysis."

  • Credit Research Foundation (CRF). (2018). "Credit Policy Benchmarking Study."

  • International Finance Corporation (IFC). (2017). "Closing the Credit Gap for Formal and Informal Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises."

  • Tanishq. (2018). "My Tanishq Campaign."

  • Harvard Business Review. (2019). "The Authenticity Paradox."

  • Bain & Company. (2021). "Luxury Goods Worldwide Market Study."

  • World Economic Forum. (2021). "The Future of Trust."

  • Harvard Business School Case Study. (2015). "Warby Parker: Vision of a 'Good' Fashion Brand."

  • Bock, L. (2015). "Work Rules!" Hachette Book Group.



ABOUT SCALING TRUST

The “Scaling Trust” is an inclusive and collaborative platform dedicated to curating ideas and fostering discussions on the critical issue of scaling trust in the digital age. Powered by Kira Studio, the initiative aims at developing a community which brings together a diverse group of thinkers, experts, and practitioners who are passionate about exploring innovative approaches to building and strengthening trust in society.

© 2024 Kira Studios. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Cookies Settings

© 2024 Kira Studios. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Cookies Settings

© 2024 Kira Studios. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Cookies Settings

© 2024 Kira Studios. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Cookies Settings

© 2024 Kira Studios. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy

Terms of Service

Cookies Settings